Thursday, 3 May 2012

How to get into Pirate Bay if you're blocked in the UK

 I wonder why they bothered to block Pirate Bay in the UK, if the following things are still rumoured to work:

  • This FireFox add-on:

  • Downloading and running the Tor Browser (doesn't need to install) from torproject.org

  • Or the easiest is to just go to http://proxybay.info/ which lists mirrors of Pirate Bay that are still known to work.
Here are some other interesting links:

The Pirate Bay on Facebook
The Pirate Bay on Twitter
Kick Ass Torrents (Another torrent site)


Now, I'm not saying that piracy should be allowed, I mean, there's no difference between making a copy of some digital ones and zeros and killing babies.  So, piracy is very, very bad.  It also prevents Hollywood, an essential industry on which our lives depend, from buying sports cars.

So, please don't pirate, because if everyone pirated, then the governments wouldn't be able to do anything about it, and that would be bad.

Piracy is also bad for the porn industry, and causes a spread of knowledge.  Too much knowledge is bad.

There are less important things to worry about, like feeding starving kids in Africa.  Governments should forget about that and focus on fighting piracy.
 
If we didn't live in the perfect system that we live in today, I'd say that we'd need a new system that works for everyone, but since capitalism is perfect, we need to defend it.

By the way, you can download my novel, "The Mischievous Nerd's Guide to World Domination," for free here:  http://losthobbit.net/download.php

... or you can buy it from Amazon http://www.amazon.co.uk/Mischievous-Nerds-Guide-World-Domination/dp/1453841326

Here's an interesting article on Piracy: 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/insertcoin/2012/02/03/you-will-never-kill-piracy-and-piracy-will-never-kill-you/

Sunday, 8 April 2012

What I'm too scared to tell anyone.

I was brought up in the Church of Christ. Every sunday I went to church, and became a very devout Christian. I would teach sunday school, lead the singing, and run the youth group. Out of love, I tried to teach people about Jesus, in the hope that they would become Christians and go to heaven.

From about the age of twenty, I started to realize that things weren't quite right. No matter what anyone said, I couldn't understand how a loving, almighty God could put people in Hell. I kept praying about this, begging God to give me some sort of explanation, but he simply wouldn't. I couldn't understand why such a powerful God, who considered himself to be my father, wouldn't want to take an hour out of his day to explain such an important concept to his servant.

The only thing I could do was think up excuses. I could not consider the possibility that the bible could be wrong, so I told myself that maybe God's just telling us that to try to make us do good, and when judgement day comes, maybe he'll just put everyone in Heaven anyway.

And so, for another five or so years, that was what I believed. During that time I learned about the concept of "cognitive dissonance." Cognitive dissonance is my favourite word, because, when you understand what it means, you understand why you think the way you do, and there is hope that you might realize the difference between what you know, and the truth. If you've never heard of "coginitve dissonance", look it up now.

When I got married, my wife and I decided to leave our churches and switch to a church which taught something inbetween what our two individual churches were teaching. It was then that I realized that the first thing I needed to do was speak to the preacher about my Hell theory. The preacher pointed out something that was quite obvious, but, due to cognitive dissonance, I had never allowed myself to think... "If you don't believe in Hell, then you believe that Jesus isn't saving you from anything, which basically means that you don't believe Jesus is your saviour, and you're not a Christian."

During the next few years I continued to find many more problems with the bible. It was as if my eyes were opened and I was suddenly able to see all the contradictions and ridiculousness that I'd never seen before. I didn't keep it to myself, because I tried to be open minded about the whole thing, and asked some of the most devout Christians that I knew to explain the things I had problems understanding. None of them could, and two of them recommended a book, which didn't explain it either. I thought that surely there's a reason they're so devout, but I discovered it was not because of knowledge, but because they believed that even though they didn't understand the bible it was still true. This leads me to wander, why would they think it's true, if they don't even understand it?

Anyway, I made a video with ten of my top problems with the bible and put them as questions on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo6m-FD_Sto

I received many views and many "answers". I put "answers" in quotes because none of them could answer my questions logically. I eventually had to realize that no matter how much I wanted to be a Christian, I simply was not. When I finally accepted this I was at peace... everything in my mind was ordered and logical, and I could finally be honest with myself.

Now, you would think that if it's so difficult for me, someone who has spent thirty years in church, and tried desperately for many years to find answers, to be a Christian, that it would be easy for me to point out the flaws in other people's thinking, but it was not so. No matter what I say to a Christian, they stick to their beliefs.

My biggest problem is that my mom, and both sets of in-laws are devout Christians. Even most of my friends are Christians. When I married my wife I thought I was a Christian, and promised my father-in-law that I would keep taking my wife to church. They all believe that anyone who is not a Christian is going to burn forever in Hell. I cannot let them know that I am not a Christian.

My mom, however, is very persistent, and realizing that my attitude towards the religion has changed, she managed to squeeze the truth out of me. She tells me that she often cries, because I am not a Christian, and no matter how much I try to explain the logic behind my thinking, she won't accept it. She never will be able to overcome her cognitive dissonance.

I want to come out of the closet. I want to tell the world that I am not a Christian. I want to explain why, but I cannot. I don't want to hurt anyone, especially not my wife, who understands that I have problems with the bible, but I don't think she quite gets how much I hate the lies that are found in the bible.

Christians are taught how evil the "world" is, but they really have no idea how loving and good an Athiest can be. I am a big supporter of The Zeitgeist Movement, something I do mostly because I am a good, loving person, but my mother doesn't see it that way... "Jesus said 'There will always be poor people,'" she tells me. She thinks it's pointless that I'm trying to help solve the problem of poverty... all I'm supposed to do is "pray". I am sick and tired of praying to a god that NEVER EVER answers.... EVER!

My friends and family keep posting on Facebook how great and wonderful Jesus is, even though he is the cause of all my family problems, but I cannot say anything. I want to point out the ridiculousness, but I cannot.

I want to explain to my mom how it's actually IMPOSSIBLE for me to be a Christian. I have let go of my closed minded thinking, and entered the world of logic, and I will never go back to the spagetti "logic" of the bible. I cannot make myself believe something if all evidence points to it being untrue.

Hardly anyone I know, knows this blog exists, so this is how I vent. I love this blog... my little connection to reality.

Saturday, 28 January 2012

A Short Story: The Real Genesis

The Real Genesis

I had one goal, "To make them think I don't exist."

It sounds simple enough... all you have to do is do nothing. Looking back I should probably have done that, but I didn't. This is my story.

Six thousand years ago I created the universe. The universe was small, but flexible. I placed the Earth, an amazing, spherical planet, with the ability to grow to adequately cater for an infinite number of occupants, directly in the center of it.

The Earth was incredible. I distributed rivers and fertile soil evenly throughout the entire planet so that no-one would ever be without food or water. I had special trees which produced fruit, others which produced clothing, and even trees that produced bedding. Wherever anyone went they would be safe, warm, clothed, and comfortable.

I produced some men and women. Every one of them was heterosexual, and very good looking. They had plenty of sex, and each time they did so, the female could decide whether she would like to become pregnant or not.

The people invented lots of games and spent all their time having fun. They never got old, never got hurt, never wanted anything that they couldn't have, and never had any reason to fight. Everything was perfect.

Unfortunately, one day, as they were gathered around a bonfire, one of them asked a question which forced me to change everything, "How did we get here?"

As they sat, roasting marshmellows from the marshmellow tree, they offered various hypothesis:

"Have you noticed how perfect everything is? Someone must have created us."

"That's not possible, for how would such a person have come about? Surely he must have evolved."

"What makes you think it's a he? It could have been a she."

"Whether it's a he or she, nor where they came from doesn't matter. What matters is that they exist."

And so the humans wasted their time trying to contact me. They called to me, and threw things into the sky. They set fire to things, to see if they could get my attention, and started writing big messages in fields. All I wanted to be was invisible.

I simply wanted it to seem like I didn't exist. I thought back to the conversation that the people had, and then it dawned on me... I could make it seem like they were created by evolution, and so I froze the humans and kept them in a storage facility as I started to change things.

I made the universe infinite in size, and created billions of useless planets and stars. I moved the Earth to a completely random location. Then I made all the planets spin and move outward at incredibly dangerously high speeds. I sped up time, so that fifteen billion years would pass. When it was all over I placed the humans back in their surroundings and thawed them out.

"We are not stupid, oh great one!" They shouted out. "Just because things are a bit more random, doesn't mean you don't exist. We see how perfect things still are. We know you're out there!"

"Damn it!" I shouted. All my work had not succeeded. I had to make things less perfect. I had to bring pain. "When I bring pain," I thought to myself, "then they will know that I do not exist."

And so I froze them again, and changed their world. I removed half of the trees, made it very cold in winter, and hot in summer. I removed ninety percent of the rivers and made everything appear to be random. Then I put them back.

"We still know you're out there! They shouted. We know you have given us painful times so we can appreciate the good times."

I couldn't believe it. They accepted my existence in spite of being cold and hot. As much as it broke my heart to do so, I had to bring more pain.

I created hurricanes, volcanoes, earthquakes and floods. I created insects that would bite and annoy people, large animals that would hunt them, trample them, and eat them, and snakes and spiders that would poison them. I made them smell bad, so that they had to continuously wash themselves, made them grow old, and become hairy. I even made some of them ugly, and some of them homosexual, so that they would not be able to have children. I made them unable to choose not to be pregnant after having sex, and made the women feel lots of pain, especially in child birth. I invented diseases, horrible ones, which would spread in all sorts of strange ways.

"Now you will know that I don't exist, I told their frozen bodies."

I thawed them out, and placed them back on the Earth.

"Oh great one!" They shouted out. "Heal us, mend us, make us well. Soothe our pain. Feed us."

No matter what I did, they still believed that I existed, and so I thought, if there's nothing I can do to make them think I don't exist, maybe I can just place the blame on someone else, and so I told them, "Twas not I! Twas the evil one! Twas the DEVIL, who gave you such pains, because you are a naughty bunch of moany, groany dimwits! But nevertheless, I am GOOD. I will cure your diseases, and feed you. I will give you warmth and comfort you. I will de-odorize your bodies and make your poop smell good. But whatever you ask for, do it quietly. You're such a noisy bunch, and I can hear your thoughts."

And so it was that I had some peace for a little while.

Little did I know that the dimwits had written down everything I had said. They made copies, and shared it amongst themselves. They spoke continuously about the writings, making up theories, expanding the written works with their nonsense.

After four thousand years, the writings had expanded to thousands of pages, filled with strange sayings and laws that I had supposedly made up. Their writings covered the entire Earth, but whenever they were transferred, changes were made. The east of the Earth had completely different writings to the west, and the middle, between the east and the west, was just completely muddled up. As I began to learn more I discovered that even in small areas, where they had the same writings they argued day and night about tiny details.

"I will end this, once and for all," I told myself. "I shall come down there and say something so ridiculous, and contradictory, that none of them will ever believe in me again."

I lay awake in bed that night, thinking of what I would tell them, writing down my ideas. I would tell them:

I am the great one that created you, and he is my father.

I am good, and just, and I will burn you eternally, so that you will have unimaginable pain for eternity if you don't believe in me.

The world will end in this generation. (When the generation dies out, they will have to stop believing in me)

Pray to me, and I will cure your diseases and remove your evil spirits. (When they eventually figure out the scientific method, they'll understand the problems with this.)

And so I went down to Earth and told them, and once again, they wrote down everything I said, copied it, made changes, and spread it throughout the Earth (except to China, because they had laws against this kind of thing).

Two thousand years later I returned and discovered that one third of them still believed the four lies that I told them.

Some philosophers had almost figured me out, but the rest of the world were dumfounded. The most notable of philosophers were these guys:

Adolf Hitler said, "Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."

Charles Taze Russell, the fellow who invented the Jehovah's Witnesses, figured out nearly all the contradictions in what I said. His little organization almost had it, but instead of realizing that I was lying, re-translated my writings to say what he wanted them to say.

And so I ask you, dear humans, after doing everything God could possibly think of to try and make you believe that he does not exist, what more can he do to prove it to you?

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

An Open Minded Bible Study - The Gospel of Mark

I've been emailing a friend about Christianity. In his email he suggested this, "Try actually reading the bible, I’d recommend any book from the Gospel and just take another look, with fresh eyes and see where it takes you."

I did... and this is where it took me:

I chose Mark, because it's supposed to be the oldest of the gospels, written at about 70 AD, according to Wikipedia. I would be lying if I said the fact that it's also the shortest was not a factor. I find it interesting that it was written forty years after the events. It does make me wonder why the author waited so long, and how he would have gathered the information, because it's obviously not possible to remember the exact words of Jesus for forty years.

I can summarize the book quite easily, because it's written simply and contains the same theme throughout:

Most of the book is about Jesus doing four things:
- Healing sick people
- Casting out demons / evil spirits
- Continuously telling people not to tell anyone what he's done, or who he really is.
- Proclaiming the good news or gospel, which was simply the fact that the Kingdom of God would come within the lifetime of some of the people that he was preaching to.

It then ends with Jesus being crucified and raised from the dead. I'm not going to consider Mark 16:9 onwards as part of Mark, because that part was not in the oldest manuscripts, and scholars believe that it was added later. According to Wikipedia, "It was likely composed early in the 2nd century and incorporated into the gospel around the middle of the 2nd century." So I'm only going to comment on the original book. With that said, however, I don't know anything about the author of Mark, so I actually have no reason to trust him or the author of Mark 16:9 onwards. Mark 16:17,18 onwards does say

And these signs will accompany those who believe: In my name they will drive out demons; they will speak in new tongues; 18 they will pick up snakes with their hands; and when they drink deadly poison, it will not hurt them at all; they will place their hands on sick people, and they will get well.”

Which does sound really far fetched... It's basically saying that Christians are able to drink deadly poison without being hurt at all. So, again,... I'm going to ignore that section.

Back to the summary:

- Jesus heals many sick people.

- Jesus casts out loads of demons.

This is quite an interesting concept. There were obviously loads of demon possessed people in those days. There was one guy who could break chains because of his possession, and another guy who had seizures.

This brings me to the obvious problem of "Where are these demons today?"

If this is all true, then at some point after the second bit of Mark was added, demons still possessed people. (I said I wouldn't use this bit, but it does seem to indicate that demons were still a problem after the second century)

So, where are they? It seems likely that the simpler theory is usually the correct one. The simpler theory is that people in those days believed in demon possession, but instead they were actually just rumours, or epileptic fits. If that's the case, then it would completely destroy the validity of any book in the bible that mentions demon possession.

- Jesus continuously tells people not to talk about him.

I could guess this is because he didn't want to become too famous at the time... needed a bit of breathing space.

- Jesus repeatedly says that the Kingdom of God is about to come within the lifetime of those listening.

So the obvious questions here are: "What is the coming of the Kingdom of God?" and "Did it happen at the time Jesus specified?"

Here are some verses that describe the coming of the Kingdom of God

- Mark 9:1 (It would come within the lifetime of those he was talking to, confirmed again in Luke 9:27, and Matthew 24:34) - And he said to them, “Truly I tell you, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see that the kingdom of God has come with power.”

- Mark 9:47 (The Kingdom is something that you can enter - as apposed to hell) And if your eye causes you to stumble, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into hell

- Mark 13:2-8 (Gives the impression that it's going to be catastrophic) - 2 “Do you see all these great buildings?” replied Jesus. “Not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

3 As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives opposite the temple, Peter, James, John and Andrew asked him privately, 4 “Tell us, when will these things happen? And what will be the sign that they are all about to be fulfilled?”

5 Jesus said to them: “Watch out that no one deceives you. 6 Many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am he,’ and will deceive many. 7 When you hear of wars and rumors of wars, do not be alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come. 8 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be earthquakes in various places, and famines. These are the beginning of birth pains.

- Mark 13:17 onwards (Describes a pretty massive event, even referring to heaven and earth passing away) - 17 How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and nursing mothers! 18 Pray that this will not take place in winter, 19 because those will be days of distress unequaled from the beginning, when God created the world, until now—and never to be equaled again.

20 “If the Lord had not cut short those days, no one would survive. But for the sake of the elect, whom he has chosen, he has shortened them. 21 At that time if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘Look, there he is!’ do not believe it. 22 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect. 23 So be on your guard; I have told you everything ahead of time.

24 “But in those days, following that distress,

“‘the sun will be darkened,
and the moon will not give its light;
25 the stars will fall from the sky,
and the heavenly bodies will be shaken.’[c]

26 “At that time people will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory. 27 And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds, from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens.

28 “Now learn this lesson from the fig tree: As soon as its twigs get tender and its leaves come out, you know that summer is near. 29 Even so, when you see these things happening, you know that it[d] is near, right at the door. 30 Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. 31 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away.

The Day and Hour Unknown

32 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 33 Be on guard! Be alert[e]! You do not know when that time will come. 34 It’s like a man going away: He leaves his house and puts his servants in charge, each with their assigned task, and tells the one at the door to keep watch.

35 “Therefore keep watch because you do not know when the owner of the house will come back—whether in the evening, or at midnight, or when the rooster crows, or at dawn. 36 If he comes suddenly, do not let him find you sleeping. 37 What I say to you, I say to everyone: ‘Watch!’”

So, the question on my mind is "Did this happen?" As I understand, this is the event that Christians refer to as "Armageddon", "The end of the world", or the "Second coming". The bible, however, clearly describes this event as something that would happen in the 1st century.

The book obviously has some good points, with Jesus talking about being good, and loving your neighbour, etc., but the nonsense about demon possession and the end of the world completely destroys any kind of validity that the book has. I also find it interesting the Jesus doesn't even mention that people have to believe in him in order to be saved... the rule that many Christians believe to be one of the fundamental principles of Christianity.

Tuesday, 23 August 2011

Statistically, are we mortal?

There's a type of bad statistics that's used whenever you only have only one piece of information... it's called a point estimate.

Here's how it works in this context:

I am currently alive, therefore chances are that I am normally alive.

Of course this is bad statistics, because one needs many samples for statistics to be accurate, something which cannot be done, because we are each only one consciousness / soul / point of experience... whatever you want to call it.

Another way to say this is: I existed after presumably having not existed (before being born), therefore it is probably possible to exist again (in a different form of course).

Another way to do a point estimate like this is, to try and calculate the odds of now being a point in time in which you're alive: e.g. 13 billion years / 70 years = presuming you only exist once, the chance that you're currently alive now is 1 in 185,714,285. That means either you're REALLY lucky, or you don't just exist once.

Thursday, 4 August 2011

Free Will is a Myth

Free will is a delusion which is confused with complexity.

Don't believe me? You probably don't, so let me explain:

Imagine humans were much, much simpler. The only thing they could do was push a blue button or a red button. The only thing they knew was that the blue button would give them pleasure and the red button would give them pain.

If the above described everything that a human was, all humans would push the blue button and no humans would push the red button... ever.

Perhaps you're wondering, but wouldn't they push the red button out of curiosity? Since the humans I've described above are extremely simple, then no, they do not have curiosity, so they would not push the red button.

But lets suppose they did have curiosity, an exact amount of curiosity, which would lead a human to push the red button from time to time. Lets also presume that there are ten such humans, all exactly the same, and all placed in exactly the same environment. All of the humans would push exactly the same buttons at the same time.

This is because every single action that a human does is due to a reason. If all humans have the same reasons, then all humans will do exactly the same things.

So, let's add some more complexity to this problem: Pushing the blue button causes someone else to feel pain, and pushing the red button causes someone else to feel pleasure. The buttons have the opposite effect on other people to what they have on the person pushing the button. The humans now have a bit of intelligence, and are also aware of the effect of their buttons.

Now that the humans are able to affect other people, they have the ability to show compassion.

Now what will happen if there are ten identical people in exactly the same environment? Will they each do different things based on their supposed "Free Will"?

The answer is "No". They will do exactly the same thing, because they have exactly the same reason. The reason might be their emotions this time, but because they have exactly the same emotions, they will do exactly the same thing as all the other humans.

Let me put this a different way:

When someone goes to court to be tried for murder, they have a psychological evaluation to see if they might have committed the crime due to a psychological problem. The fact is that ALL murderers have a psychological problem. Unfortunately if we let all murderers go free then there would be a lot more murder going on, so we don't lock people up to take revenge on them; we lock them up to reduce the chance of future murders.

Imagine that you were born as the murderer. You had the same parents, the same body, the same friends, the same experiences, etc... do you think you would have done anything differently to the murderer?

You wouldn't have, because there is no reason for you to do anything different. The murderer had a reason for committing the murder and you would have had the same reason. If you don't believe me, what makes you so special, that you would not have committed the murder?

Perhaps you had a better upbringing, or watched less violent television, or had enough money that you never needed to consider committing a crime.

We are the product of our genetics, our memories, our emotions and our intelligence, not the product of free will.

Friday, 8 July 2011

Poetic vs logical arguments.

The biggest problem I have when communicating with religious people is the number of poetic words that they tend to use. One can't argue with poetry, because poetry is not supposed to be logical, and it's not supposed to make sense.

Some examples of poetic words are words like "faith", "deserves" and "worthy". While they might seem perfectly logical, one has to try to deconstruct a word into its simplest form, and then one will know whether or not that word really has meaning.

Let me start with "faith".

In the real world, an intelligent person will believe something in the same proportion to the quality of the evidence which they know of. Here is a chart to demonstrate:











The next chart shows the opposite: Irrational thinking, where a person's confidence level is the opposite of the quality of the evidence which they have.










The dictionary definition of faith is: Belief without proof. The less evidence, the more faith is required. Here's the chart.










The next chart demonstrates that intelligent belief + faith = 100% certainty. Faith is when you believe something in spite of the quality of the evidence. It's a stuffing, like the polystyrene chips that one has to dig out of a box to get to the thing which really matters.












You may ask, "What if someone says they have faith in someone's ability to drive?" In that context, the word faith is exactly as I've defined it above. Based on all evidence available there might be a 99.99% chance that they will survive driving from A to B, but if you are 100% confident, you have inflated your confidence by 0.01% above reality.

What I'm writing is not really about faith. It's more to demonstrate that whatever you believe faith is, if it's not this, then it's different to what I believe it is. That means that if you and I have a different understanding of a word, it won't make sense for us to use it in a conversation. We would have to search for words that we both agree on the meaning.

The next two words I want to talk about are "deserves" and "worthy". Unlike faith, these words do have a meaning, but only in a certain context. That context is a made-up rule or law.

If you drop an apple, and it hits the ground, you've proven the fact that gravity makes apples drop to the ground, but you cannot say "an apple deserves to hit the ground", because that implies a made-up rule.

The apple is not worthy of hitting the ground either, because it still implies a made-up rule. You may say that Prince William deserves to be king, or that he is worthy of being a king, which is correct, because the made-up rule might be something like "princes become kings".

The problem with "deserves" and "worthy", is that if you use them to argue a case, you're implying a rule, and it's usually the rule itself that needs to be argued. I may not agree that princes should become kings. Instead I may believe that a better rule would be to have a contest to determine who the next king should be.

A rule also requires a reason. This reason is absolutely essential for a reasonable argument. To say "princes become kings" has no value without a reason. The reason might be something like, because royal families have a lot of power, so they keep the king in the family to be selfish. (I don't know if that's the reason, but I'm just making this up)

The next word I want to talk about is "punishment", which relates nicely to "deserves" and "worthy", because punishment is based on made-up rules that serve a purpose.

The purpose of punishment is typically something like this: To protect the majority of people. It does so because people will see the punishment, which is typically something painful or uncomfortable, causing them to have fear, or it will keep them locked up, so that they're no longer able to harm other people.

So punishment protects a group of people, and works by either through fear, or prevention.

When I ask religious people whether hell is revenge or punishment, they usually don't respond, but those who do respond call it "punishment."

So I leave you with the following thought:

Does a place of eternal suffering protect anyone?

Of course not, so hell is not actually punishment. It's something else... it's a made-up rule that says that people who do not have faith (see above for definition) burn forever. If you can come up with a good reason for that, using words that we both agree on the meaning, then that's fine, but considering that I already don't think faith has any value, and don't see any value in burning people forever, I doubt that very much.

If I were a loving, all powerful God, I'd have simply made everyone eternally happy.